2026.01.10 – By Andreas Sabadello
As a follow-up to our earlier article on the validity of indexation clauses in consumer leases, this update addresses the most significant legislative reform of Austrian tenancy law in recent years. On 1 January 2026, the 5th Tenancy Law Inflation Mitigation Act (5. Mietrechtliches Inflationslinderungsgesetz, 5. MILG, BGBl I 2025/114) and the Rent Value Security Act (Mieten-Wertsicherungsgesetz, MieWeG) entered into force. The reform fundamentally restructures how landlords may pass on inflation to residential tenants.
The new regime applies not only to new leases but also to the vast majority of existing contracts concluded before 1 January 2026. Landlords and property managers must adapt their indexation practice accordingly.
The MieWeG applies to all residential lease agreements within the full and partial scope of the Austrian Tenancy Act (MRG). For the first time, this includes freely agreed rents (§ 1 para 4 MRG in conjunction with § 16 MRG) in newer buildings that were previously unregulated with regard to indexation.
Excluded from the scope remain:
The following observations focus on residential leases in the partial scope of the MRG and on freely agreed rents, which are the constellations primarily addressed by our earlier article. Separate rules apply within the price-regulated full scope of the MRG and are not discussed here in detail.
Indexation adjustments may now take effect only once per year, on 1 April — irrespective of what the lease contract provides. If a contract stipulates a different reference month (e.g., January, June, or the anniversary of the contract), the adjustment must nonetheless be deferred to the following 1 April. Inflation accruing between the contractual reference date and the following 1 April cannot be recovered.
The core mechanism of § 1 para 2 MieWeG is a damping rule applied to the annual average change of the CPI 2020 (VPI 2020):
Example: An average annual inflation of 5 % results in a permissible rent increase of 4 % (3 % + 50 % of 2 %).
The MieWeG does not replace the contractual indexation clause. Instead, it caps its effect. For every indexation event after 1 January 2026, landlords must carry out a parallel calculation:
Only the lower of the two amounts may be charged. The contractual calculation continues to run independently over the lease term, so that in years where inflation falls below the MieWeG cap, the contractual figure may again become the binding ceiling.
For existing leases, the month of the last effective indexation is deemed to be the moment of contract conclusion for the purposes of the MieWeG (§ 4 para 2 MieWeG). For the calendar year in which that last indexation occurred, the annual average change is taken into account only pro rata temporis — i.e., in proportion to the full months remaining in that year (§ 1 para 2 Z 2 MieWeG).
Example: If the last contractual indexation was based on the CPI 2020 for February 2024, ten full months of 2024 remain (March–December). The 2024 annual average change (2.90939 %) is therefore applied only at 10/12, i.e., 2.42449 %.
For leases concluded from 1 January 2026 onwards, § 2 MieWeG offers landlords the option of directly adopting the statutory indexation model as the contractual clause. A reference to the statutory model — "wertgesichert gemäß § 1 Abs 2 MieWeG" — suffices as a valid indexation clause and obviates the need for a parallel calculation.
This approach has the further advantage of being immunised against the strict transparency and content review under § 6 para 1 Z 5 KSchG and § 879 para 3 ABGB. Whether it is preferable to the continued use of a bespoke CPI-based clause is ultimately a commercial judgement: the statutory model ties the landlord permanently to the 3 % half rule, whereas a compliant contractual clause preserves flexibility in low-inflation years while still being subject to the MieWeG cap. Both approaches have legitimate applications, and the choice should be made in light of the specific portfolio and letting strategy.
For existing contracts, § 4 para 3 MieWeG limits restitution claims based on invalid indexation clauses to payments made in the last five years before the end of the lease or before the tenant's knowledge of the invalidity. The three-year limitation period from knowledge remains unchanged. Exception: where the clause is invalid due to abusiveness under the EU Unfair Terms Directive, this five-year cap does not apply — a significant carve-out given the OGH's consistently strict jurisprudence in consumer matters (see our earlier article).
Under the amended § 29 MRG, the minimum fixed-term period for residential leases in the scope of the MRG is raised from three to five years, provided the landlord is an entrepreneur within the meaning of the KSchG. This applies equally to new leases and to renewals. For non-entrepreneur landlords, the three-year minimum remains available.
The reform fundamentally reshapes day-to-day indexation practice:
The reform does not override the consumer protection jurisprudence of the Supreme Court discussed in our earlier article. Indexation clauses that are invalid for lack of transparency, for linking to the Baukostenindex, or for permitting increases within the first two months of the contract remain invalid — and the statutory reference model under § 2 MieWeG is not available to repair pre-existing clauses. Contract review therefore remains the single most important practical step for landlords operating under legacy templates.
Disclaimer
The numerical examples used in this article are illustrative only. They are intended to demonstrate the methodology of the parallel calculation under the MieWeG and do not constitute binding figures for any specific lease. Any actual indexation calculation must be based on the current and final index values published by Statistik Austria and applied to the specific contractual situation.
As the MieWeG and the 5. MILG only entered into force on 1 January 2026, there is at present no settled case law on their interpretation. Several of the questions discussed above — in particular the interplay between the statutory damping mechanism, contractual threshold triggers, and the onboarding aliquotation — may be subject to clarification by the Austrian Supreme Court in the coming years. The analysis in this article reflects the prevailing view in the legal literature as of the date of publication.
This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on a specific lease or indexation notification, please contact us directly.
About Sabadello Legal
Sabadello Legal provides strategic and practical support to landlords in all aspects of Austrian tenancy law. We advise on the legally compliant drafting and review of lease agreements, enforcement of claims against defaulting tenants, and the termination of leases — even in complex cases.
Our real estate law team represents commercial and residential landlords across Austria. With extensive experience in advising operators of shopping centres, retail parks, office properties, and residential complexes, we assist our clients in negotiations, ongoing tenancy management, and legal disputes.
RA Mag. Andreas Sabadello
+43 1 9971037
office@sabadello.legal